Sunday, June 13, 2010

Mobile Internet Gateway Functionality Matrix - Invitation to Vendors

 
I am starting today a new matrix, covering the mobile gateway market.

This 10+ years old market is changing rapidly to meet the new challenges of today's mobile data services - functions, performance (10Gbps+), standard compliance (3GPP) and the market desire to use less boxes and an integrated solution.

Many companies that used to offer a single function gateway (such as a WAP, traffic optimization or content adaption gateway) are now integrating multiple functions into a single solution (and device) either by self-developing or OEM/partnerships with other companies.

Clearly some of the older functions are not so relevant today but may still be needed for backwards compatibility, while new functions gain popularity.

My initial list for the matrix includes:

  • Vendors: Acision, Allot, Bytemobile, Comverse, Cisco, Ericsson, Flash Networks, Huawei, Infogin, Mobixell (724 Solutions), Nokia Siemens networks, Novarra, Openwave, Radware, Sandvine, Volantis.
     
  • Gateway functions: WAP gateway, Data/TCP optimization/acceleration, Content Adaption, Content charging, CDR generation, Advice of use, Video Optimization, DPI, traffic shaping, tiered services, quota control, URL filtering, URL black list, Anti-Virus/worm detection, outgoing SPAM detection, DDoS prevention, network intelligence (monitoring and reporting), traffic steering, content caching, compliance with 3GPP PCRF, session boarder control (SBC), ad-insertion (advertizing), VoIP quality monitoring.
I invite gateway vendors (whether listed above or not) to send me the functions they support today, comment about the importance of each function in recent RFPs, and suggest additional functions to be covered.  Please include links to the relevant web pages.

Saturday, June 12, 2010

BE (UK): World Cup Without Buffering

  
It seems that major sporting events are good for ISP marketing. After we saw Airtel's (India) "Cricket without Buffering" (here) we get now a new, a bit confusing I must say, campaign from BE (UK) to "end buffering, because it’s going to hinder you from making the most out of your online viewing experience".

This is announced in connection to the 2010 World Cup opened yesterday. See BE's blog post "BE’S CAMPAIGN TO BANISH BUFFERING" (here). The post mixes several issues related to Over the Top Video services: speed, throughput, traffic shaping and byte-cap (quota) trying to show that BE is has superior QoE compared to other ISPs.

So why it is sp confisuing?

For once, BE says that "For example, the average UK broadband speed is 3.6mbps, but streaming video needs an average of 9mbps of bandwidth to avoid buffering" - buffering is used to overcome the jitter (variance in throughput). You cannot stream 9 Mbps (if this is what you need) over 3.6 for 90 minutes football ("soccer") match ... (or buffering will take you almost 90 minutes). Buffering maybe needed with any connection speed, to overcome temporary congestion conditions anywhere between the subscriber and the streaming server.

BE's bottom line is "With no traffic shaping in place, you can be sure that you’ll never be “buffering about” ever again" (!). Actually, traffic shaping is the tool to grant higher (or highest) priority to streaming video .. traffic shaping is an effective toos to minimize buffering!

Related post - "Apple TV Goes Streaming, HD and to the Clouds" - here