2 recent articles show a very different carrier view of Wi-Fi offloading:
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/da1e0/da1e045bab3c8204e287e58a0e7fbf50291bc1cb" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f4058/f40583b891fda13d68be6285a86d84879bf2e32b" alt=""
See "Wi-Fi Offload Set to Boom in India" - here.
A recent In-Stat report supports the above trend (see "In-Stat: Wi-Fi Hotspot Growth Continues to be Strong" - here). See also "Juniper Research: By 2015 63% of Mobile Traffic will be Offloaded to a Fixed Connection" - here and "How Much of Smartphone Traffic could be Offloaded to Wi-Fi?" - here.
Nevertheless, Stacey Higginbotham (picture) reports to GigaOm that an AT&T "executive noted that AT&T didn’t see Wi-Fi helping the nation’s No. 2 carrier offset congestion [see "AT&T: Times Square needs a Wifi Boost to cope with 3G Traffic" - here] because in most cases people don’t use Wi-Fi unless they are sitting still in a hot-spot. And apparently, there are plenty of people still wandering around watching YouTube videos"
The article notes that "It is possible to create a Wi-Fi network that allows a user to remain on the Wi-Fi network, even when moving. Other good work on this comes from chip firms where engineers are discussing standards to enable seamless hopping from hot spot to hot spot or perhaps even a handoff between a cellular and Wi-Fi network"
See "Why Isn’t Wi-Fi Better?" - here. See also "AT&T: We Need T-Mobile for the "wireless broadband revolution" - here.
No comments:
Post a Comment