A common say by broadband operators (and DPI vendors) is that x% (usually 5%) of broadband subscribers consume yy% (usually 50%) of total traffic (like here and here). Without un-biased hard data, this was so far just a common argument to justify traffic management - like saying "these abusers take it all from the silent majority".
In addition, when mobile operators are moving to usage-based billing (see - AT&T, Verizon, O2 UK) they usually say something like "Currently, 98% of AT&T smartphone customers use less than 2 GB of data a month on average" - i.e. moving to unlimited data is good for you, Mr. consumer. Some challenge this - see an example here.
Nielsen Wire has just published some findings on US smartphone usage, showing percentile information.
The data comes from real phone bills ("from more than 60,000 mobile customers every month") and Q1 of 2010 shows an increase of 230% (!) in the average data consumption. In 2010, the top 6% consumed 50% of all data.
According to Nielsen - "99% .. are better off with a pricing scheme like AT&T’s new data pricing model than under flat-rate pricing where they are paying for much more than they ever use.". This confirms AT&T claims.
So I wonder why AT&T is doing this - maybe they expect this 230% yearly growth to continue .. (see "AT&T CTO: Traffic has Grown 5,000% in 3 Years" - here).
No comments:
Post a Comment